Chroniclers can be impartial. It is their literary corner. Life to a certain point is like looking at the clear sky. I was born with an aesthetic that was not pleasant, a prelude. Now I'm here with the gap in the roof, after a bright childhood, a cloudy youth , and a thin ray of sunshine . 

Like me in the movie the [shape] of the water, the characters hold positions. 

The society works as a fucked pyramid . Patriarchy is not just a sociological word but is for real. 

The white man in the movie for example, the classic American white man, conservative, buying a modern innovative new car, prejudicedly subjugating the world in front of his sight. In other case a white barman forbiddenning a Black woman to sit in the bank and kiking out a 

gay man saying the coffe is for family people. Being situated in time and space is not a shallow phrase as it seems to be. 

The film contests creationism, if God makes someone born conditioned, does this mean that the conditioned being becomes naturaly for imposition without potential?  

the main point is who is the real monster, in the movie, if is the white man who uses the concept of existence of God, to justify his position and potential in society, or the creature wich express his affection to a woman, even with his wild nature. Does do something lacking of attributes be still valuable able to respond with reciprocity to the good and not good of someone else after a touch of comprehension(he's the lonelinest creature I've ever seen)and an authentic gest of afect?